A common practice for soil sampling is to collect a discrete sample (soil from a known location and depth) from a few points and compare the analytical data to exposure criteria. In particular situations, discrete sampling is biased and not reproducible. For instance, if a soil sample is analyzed for arsenic and the aliquot of soil that was processed contains an arsenic-bearing mineral, results from that soil sample would not necessarily be representative of site conditions. The incremental sampling method (ISM) attempts to remove some of the variability associated with discrete sampling by combing small amounts of soil collected from many locations across a site and essentially capturing the average contaminant concentration.
Prior to implementing a sampling plan that utilizes ISM, developing a thorough conceptual site model (CSM) is an essential component to identifying potentially impacted areas at a site. Once the acceptable exposure level has been identified, the site is divided into decision units (DUs). A set of DUs over a site can be designated as either equal areas that are based on exposure or irregular areas in and around a known source area. Depending on the necessary number of sample increments (minimum of 30 to 50), a sample grid is generated over each DU. Soil increments collected from each grid node across a DU are combined and sent to a lab where the sample is further processed and sub-sampled.
Incremental sampling method (ISM) pattern across a decision unit (DU).
Envirologic was involved with a residential redevelopment project where ISM was employed as a unique tool to address exposure concerns. Soil analytical results from discrete samples, collected during a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, showed metals in excess of direct contact criteria. Two potential sources were identified: 1.) fill material with slag that was used to surface the site to the current grade and 2.) aerial deposition from a nearby iron smelting facility. Prior to collecting ISM samples, the site was split into DUs based on future residential lots, with each lot representing a DU. Results from the ISM samples indicated that the direct contact pathway presented an unacceptable exposure risk at a few of the future residential lots. Envirologic thus proposed remedial options for the lots where the direct contact pathway was potentially complete, with the goal of allowing for redevelopment across the entire site.
ISM is commonly used to evaluate exposure concerns stemming from metals in soil at or near the ground surface; however, this method can also be implemented at various depths or for different suites of contaminants. Due to less variability associated with the analytical data, when compared to discrete sampling, ISM allows for a higher degree of confidence when evaluating risks associated with an exposure pathway. While ISM may incur additional setup time due to grid generation and layout, lower analytical costs allow for ISM to be financially competitive with traditional discrete sampling.
There are often sampling needs as part of an environmental investigation; let Envirologic support your project using our experienced Field Services team. For a complete list of our Field Services, please visit our website or contact a member of our team at (269) 342-1100 or by email.
Subscribe to email alerts from the Envirologic Blog.
ism • incremental soil sampling • phase ii esa • environmental site assessment • soil • analytics • pathway • exposure • risk • direct contact • exposure • investigation • sampling • contaminant •